Am I missing something, or are they actually unable to reliably host a static site? There are so many viable options (Netlify, Github pages, even the classic wordpress.com). I highly doubt the claim of professional hacker - based on the grammar in their final note and the haphazard arrangement of information in the archived site, I'd speculate they had a gaping hole somewhere and never bothered to fix it.
from Hacker News - New Comments: "WordPress" http://bit.ly/2WTTZaf
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment